Not graceful slow beat, remember a testimony of Fujifilm X100T

Before the X100F update was about to come, I decided to give this X100T, which I tortured so hard to remember

Accustomed to the quality of the camera, one day will want a light-equipped machine for carrying. After deterring the iPhone's anti-glare power and post-look space a few times, I decided to make a smaller camera. After a non-tangled selection, Fujifilm X100T was selected. This machine has a lot of special factors that attract me, almost silent shutter, modeling, modeling, and modeling. In fact, there are not many X100T products. If you know that you need 35mm or 28mm, there is almost no hesitation. .


When I bought the X100T price is still less than 6000, and now it looks like this. It's good to buy early and enjoy early.

Frankly speaking, the main purpose of buying it is to look at the retro style. My request on the second-hand milk machine First of all, at least the picture quality should not be too bad. Secondly, people have the desire to shoot is also very important, including the desire to take pictures and take Going to take it's desire, anyway. In short, this camera is very pleasing, silver black color and at least the appearance of a cookie (I do not care about how it is inside), people have the urge to go out and force. There is nothing shameful to be able to force.

However, I didn't want to pick up something like the “elegance of slow beats” and “intrinsic nature of photography” like some brain powder, which made everyone laugh. To be honest, if you're a stroking party, the Leica Typ 113 and the Olympus Pen-F would be a better choice. Although Fuji has a retro-looking viewfinder window, it is also one of the few models that makes metal plastic and has a hard and greasy skin. The gap is too large and the problem of ash incurs haunting me. There are a few unaffected dusts in my viewfinder, but fortunately the lens is still intact and it is only a bit obtrusive.

Back to the question, the main task of the X100T is to take the place of daytime street sweeps, and place friends and other occasions that do not need photography. It's a little bit bigger and the volume control is a bit out of bounds, but the lens is very flat and it's easy to put in a messenger bag. I previously used the Olympus E-P5 + M.ZD 17mm F1.8. The combined lens length is a bit slim. I also gave it a retro strap with cam-in.

Regarding quality, I am personally satisfied. There is no need to superstition X-Trans or whether there is no low-pass, APS-C frame of the body is rarely enough. It is bragging to catch up. What I am more satisfied with is Fuji's smear algorithm. In the case of "non-portrait" at night, the smear within the camera is better than most other brands. It's like taking a sharp note while adding noise, and the final result is very good. Suitable for my main use of street sweeping. Olympus is not the best at painting. I don't care if ISO imaginary labels are not standard. In most cases, I'm an automatic ISO. Controlling the aperture and shutter is enough. It's better to know if it's not good to shoot. I'm like this. However, under the same circumstances, ISO values ​​are often higher than those of Dafa's full-frame cameras. This is a disadvantage.

About this 23mm lens. Fuji controlled the volume of the lens very well. RX1, Typ 113, or Olympus didn't compress the lens to such a volume. It was similar to 20 cakes in terms of volume and external focus performance. Not to mention here. In the daily distance of 3m-∞, the picture of X100T made me rest assured and stable. When the picture is low, the picture is delicate, but the particles under high sense are increased but the color noise is easy to control. To pick a thorn, it can be said that there may be some lack of three-dimensional feeling. The photos are flat. Although this lens is very well-balanced, it also gives up 28mm and a part of the image quality (many people think that the X100 series with 28mm add-on mirror is complete). As many of Sony's shots do not control the dispersion, but Fuji also does not care about the spherical aberration on the X system. Compared to the M.ZD 17mm F1.8, which I used before, with the same equivalent 35mm viewing angle, the close up of the camera does not boast of perfection, and it is definitely a disaster to use the F2 aperture on the object within 3m. , In order to ensure the quality of daily use, I basically received the use of F4 (far-focus F2 screen details and the best aperture is not a small difference). As for the macro function, please send it. Please enjoy F8.

Why choose 35mm, I mentioned 35mm for home use when I unpacked FE35 1.4. Shooting relatives and friends is a good option for retiring (but maybe not suitable for taking Wa Party, but I don't have baby). Although just flirtatious F2 aperture, but humans have so many soft-focus lens, a little spherical aberration will not block my enthusiasm for human behavior observation shooting.


Know what you love to see, this is where it comes from. Remember to like it.

For portraits, counting the details is not very important (of course there is not one type of portrait). It is also true for family records. So don't worry about it. Use it to shoot it.

On the operating experience, first of all, the X100T is very light, without the same kind of heavy mechanical feeling of the Leica body when it is on the hand. I said before that there is even a sense of plastic. Buttons, dials are enough, anyway, I do not want to use it to completely take pictures manually, most of the operation can be placed in the Q menu, shutter and aperture have separate rings, if the request is not high, you can directly behind the 4 The arrow keys are used as the focus point selection, which is very touching on this not very good focus machine. Speaking of focusing is not very good, I think it's almost like 20 cakes. It's all out of focus (into the gray ~ into the gray ~), how to describe it, not described it, used to know the old man and 20 cakes, do not know I wish you do not have the opportunity to know it, hope the X100F improvement.

The hybrid viewfinder is a feature of Fuji. The reason why it is "character" rather than "bright spot" is because it does not want to boast that it is a "bright spot." First of all, the OVF part is not a Leica-like linked rangefinder macular focus, which is a hole in the camera body alone, so not only has the same rangefinder error in the rangefinder, but also the problem of inaccurate focus display, even in the menu Calibration is turned on and 2 focus frames are displayed, as is the case. It is worth mentioning that it is a good practice to superimpose a small screen in the OVF to display the focus screen. However, this small screen is somewhat dim in the OVF under large sunlight, and it is not very clear. I don't need OVF anyway. If it's my friend who likes to use Polaroid, maybe I wouldn't be as picky as me. It should be cool. The problem with EVF is that it has a serious bluish cast. This is in the first generation of the X100 series, and there are still color casts on the X-Pro2. Perhaps the hybrid viewfinder cannot use the TFT screen. In short, the viewfinder is the number one reason why I replaced the E-P5 with the X100T, but it's really hard to love this viewfinder. Hopefully, the X100F will improve.

Speaking of Fuji's colors, it's interesting to have filters straight out and have to pick one. I like the warm yellow and elegant colors of Classic Chrome, as well as the deep green color. I don't like oversaturated or even spilled images, so I don't love Velvia. In terms of portraits, I like to shoot out some white paper, but at the same time like high contrast, so PRO.Neg is not suitable for me. Provia, Astia, and PRO.Neg.Hi can shoot portraits, but it does not prevent yellowing of the skin under warm light. If S and N are criticized for being green and blue, Fuji is a golden Buddha light. It is not necessary to move too much orange in PS but it is necessary to adjust the highlights. Combining the characteristics of the algorithm in the high sense of the application of the destruction of the skin, shoot people's photos or recommend RAW into the LR, PS later.

In general, the inside of the machine, not the filter, is Film simulations. If you count on it to save the ridiculous effects of the numerous rotten movies you shoot, or what "flim taste," then advise you Find a quiet place to sit and meditate, shake my head, and hear the sound of the sea. I prefer the film style, but the default is still relatively light, there is no real film so strong color tendencies (still some Conservative), for example, I don't like the Portra series (Kodak after all). My experience is that if I don't want to postpone it, if the desired style is just inside, then the presets prepared by Fuji can reach 70% of the results I want. The rest can be adjusted by using the APP of the mobile phone. After all (this is the main function after all), this is very convenient. However, the "too lazy" late and "no" are two different things. If you do not know the colors you want, then there are many more pre-defined color palettes that are tempting you to go astray.


In short, the words are finished, and Tucao is also an enjoyable one. Let's look forward to the X100F and the upcoming silver X-T2. After all, the silver-gray is the place where Fujifilm forcing.


Portable Bluetooth Speaker

If you are fed up with carrying around heavy and clunky speakers, then this Portable Bluetooth Speaker is ideal for you. Featuring a compact and sleek design that you`ll want to show off, it will be any youngster`s instant favorite!We are a professional Chinese manufacturer of Portable bluetooth speaker , and look forward to your cooperation!

Portable bluetooth speaker

Bluetooth SpeakerX3 bluetooth speaker

Rugby bluetooth speakerWireless Bluetooth Speakerplant bluetooth speaker


Portable Bluetooth Speaker,Portable Wireless Bluetooth Speaker,Bluetooth Portable Speaker,Mini Portable Bluetooth Speaker

Reteck Electronic Co., Ltd. , https://www.reteck.com